Buster Blackjack

 admin

Buster Blackjack is an exciting Blackjack side bet that allows players to win based on the number of cards in the dealer's busted hand. Buster Blackjack Game Info The classic card game is given a modern twist in this Buster Blackjack title from Playtech. Buster side bets give you a chance to win handsomely if the dealer goes bust! The clean, smart presentation of this game means that it looks good on both desktops and mobile devices. Buster blackjack, buster blackjack odds, buster blackjack side bet, buster blackjack card counting, buster blackjack online, buster blackjack in las vegas, buster blackjack free, buster blackjack rtp, buster blackjack rules, buster blackjack double deck, buster blackjack strategy, blackjack buster bet, blackjack buster bet payouts, blackjack buster bet odds, how to play buster blackjack.

1 vote (4.54%)
4 votes (18.18%)
6 votes (27.27%)
1 vote (4.54%)
5 votes (22.72%)
2 votes (9.09%)
No votes (0%)
4 votes (18.18%)
4 votes (18.18%)
1 vote (4.54%)

22 members have voted

Wizard
Administrator
Buster Blackjack is a side bet if the dealer busts. The win depends on the number of cards required. I think this side bet has been around for a while. I thought I wrote up a page on it, but couldn't find it, so just created a new Buster Blackjack page.
Please click on the link and let me know what you think. As always, I welcome all questions, comments, and especially corrections.
The question for the poll is would you play Buster Blackjack, assuming you were playing blackkjack in the first place?
It's not whether you win or lose; it's whether or not you had a good bet.
Wizardofnothing
Mike you were quite comical with the options toniggt
No longer hiring, don’t ask because I won’t hire you either
Acender
With a high enough count, could the buster bet become lucrative?
Ibeatyouraces

With a high enough count, could the buster bet become lucrative?


https://apheat.net/2013/04/25/card-counting-the-buster-blackjack-side-bet-6-decks/
DUHHIIIIIIIII HEARD THAT!
Wizard
Administrator

Mike you were quite comical with the options toniggt


Thanks. To be honest, I'm starting to run low on ideas.
It's not whether you win or lose; it's whether or not you had a good bet.
charliepatrick
I'm depressed - the house edge is fairly high so surely it should be rated as in the 'best avoided' category.
Acender

/2013/04/25/card-counting-the-buster-blackjack-side-bet-6-decks/


That's actually quite reasonable. Not a bad SB at all.
Quote: charliepatrick

I'm depressed - the house edge is fairly high so surely it should be rated as in the 'best avoided' category.


Take some happy pills and make some buster bets. The future is a bright one!
Paradigm
With almost 92% of wins paying 2-1, this bet requires red action to have any juice for the player. Works well and gets action in So Cal market where it is difficult to play anything less than $15 min BJ. $15-$25 main bet with a $5-$10 Buster bet seems to work.
A $5 main with a $1 Buster bet that is going to pay you $2 when the dealer busts...not so exciting for me, but AGS is placing it aggressively these days. It will be interesting to see how sticky it is outside of its So Cal original market.

Wizard Of Odds Buster Blackjack

Joeman
So, I was playing the demo and was dealt a BJ. Since I had the Buster bet up, dealer finished out his hand, eventually drawing to a 21. It pushed my main BJ bet! I assume this is a glitch in the app, and not an actual rule of the bet?
Not happy with how the marshmallow was insufficient in melting the chocolate bar in a s'more, my Mom would pre-make the s'more and wrap it in aluminum foil. Then, we would put these 'packages' on a grate over the campfire for a few minutes. It was literally a 'hot mess' to try and eat, but... Best. S'mores. Ever.
gordonm888
First, if the players all bust then usually the dealer does not hit his hand to determine whether hhands of <17 would ahve gone bust. - do you lose the Buster BJ side-bet in this situation? Or does the dealer hits his cards anyway if he has less than a 17 in order to determine the outcome of the sidebet? If the dealer does not always play out his hand, the House Edge on the sidebet should be calculated assuming that the dealer does not play the hand when all players go bust -and thus the calculated side-bet should be a function of the number of players at the table. Buster blackjack game
I am very confused by this site:

Buster Blackjack Rtp

https://apheat.net/2013/04/25/card-counting-the-buster-blackjack-side-bet-6-decks/


The House edge is quoted to be different than what the Wizard just calculated for what appears to be the same assumptions on BJ rules. In this site's quoted simulation of 100M hands on a six-deck game with a card count of the A,2,3 cards, I don't understand if the dealer is assumed to play out his <17 hands when the player goes bust.

Buster Blackjack In Las Vegas

So many better men, a few of them friends, are dead. And a thousand thousand slimy things live on, and so do I.

Buster Blackjack Side Bet

I noticed one of the local Indian shops was doing a 'Buster Blackjack' side bet. Optional side bet, if the dealer busts, you get paid. If it takes the dealer a lot of hands to bust, you get paid more. Max side bet is equal to main BJ bet.
When googling for it, I turned up this page in South Dakota:
http://legis.state.sd.us/rules/DisplayRule.aspx?Rule=20:18:15:30.07 (Archive copy)
I don't remember, but I think the pays table I saw was the H3 paytable.
a) Idea on house edge?
b) Idea of it's exploitable? I was thinking maybe it would be better in a negative count situation?